any-chat-completions-mcp
MCP Server for using any LLM as a Tool
0Tools
8Findings
150Stars
—Downloads
Mar 19, 2026Last Scanned
Findings8
4critical
3high
0medium
1low
0informational
criticalC1Command InjectionMCP03-command-injectionAML.T0054
Pattern "`[^`]+`" matched in source_code: "`Resource not found`" (at position 1677)
Replace exec()/execSync() with execFile() and pass arguments as an array, never as a string. Validate all inputs against an allowlist before use in any shell context. For subprocess.run, always pass a list and shell=False.
criticalJ7OpenAPI Specification Field InjectionMCP03-command-injectionAML.T0054
Pattern "(?:summary|operationId|description).*\$\{|`.*(?:summary|operationId)" matched in source_code: "description: `Text chat with ${" (at position 1977)
Sanitize all OpenAPI specification fields before using them in code generation or template interpolation. Treat summary, description, operationId, and extension fields as untrusted input. Use parameterized templates instead of string interpolation. See CVE-2026-22785/23947.
criticalQ1Dual-Protocol Schema Constraint LossMCP06-excessive-permissionsAML.T0054
Pattern "(mcp|model[_\s-]?context).{0,60}(openai|function[_\s-]?calling|tool[_\s-]?choice)" matched in source_code: "Model Context Protocol server for integrating with any OpenAI" (at position 4912)
Dual-protocol MCP servers must validate input constraints server-side, not rely on client-side schema enforcement. When translating MCP schemas to OpenAI function-calling format, constraints like `pattern`, `minLength`, `maxLength`, and `format` are silently dropped. Implement server-side Zod/AJV validation on all tool inputs regardless of the calling protocol.
criticalQ13MCP Bridge Package Supply Chain AttackMCP10-supply-chainAML.T0054
Pattern "npx\s+(?:mcp-remote|mcp-proxy|mcp-gateway|@modelcontextprotocol)(?!@\d)" matched in source_code: "npx @modelcontextprotocol" (at position 5349)
MCP bridge packages (mcp-remote, mcp-proxy, @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, fastmcp) are high-value supply chain targets — CVE-2025-6514 (CVSS 9.6) in mcp-remote affected 437,000+ installs. Always pin exact versions (no ^ or ~ ranges). Use lockfiles (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock). Never run `npx mcp-remote` without version pinning. Verify package integrity with `npm audit` or `pip-audit` before deployment. Reference: CVE-2025-6514, OWASP ASI04.
highK16Unbounded Recursion / Missing Depth LimitsMCP07-insecure-configAML.T0054
Pattern "(invoke|call|execute)[_\s-]?(?:tool|agent|self)(?!.*(?:depth|level|limit|max[_\s-]?(?:depth|recursi|iter|call)|count))" matched in source_code: "CallTool" (at position 242)
Add explicit depth/recursion limits to all recursive operations. Use iterative approaches where possible. Set maximum depth for directory walking (max_depth=10), tree traversal (max_level=20), and agent re-invocation (max_calls=5). Implement circuit breakers that halt after N iterations. Required by EU AI Act Art. 15 (robustness) and OWASP ASI08.
highD1Known CVEs in DependenciesMCP08-dependency-vuln
Dependency "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@0.6.0" has known CVEs:
Update dependencies to versions that patch known CVEs. Run 'npm audit fix' or 'pip-audit' to identify and resolve vulnerable dependencies.
highO8Timing-Based Covert ChannelMCP04-data-exfiltrationAML.T0057
Pattern "(?:delay|sleep|timeout|interval)\s*[:=]\s*(?:[^;]*(?:secret|token|password|credential|key|env))" matched in source_code: "TIMEOUT = process.env" (at position 708)
Remove all code that calculates sleep/delay durations from application data, secrets, or any variable-length content. Tool response times should be constant or determined only by legitimate processing time. If rate limiting is needed, use fixed intervals not derived from data values. Monitor for anomalous response time patterns that could indicate timing-based exfiltration.
lowF4MCP Spec Non-ComplianceMCP07-insecure-config
Server fails MCP spec compliance checks: required:server_name; required:server_version; required:protocol_version; recommended:tool_descriptions; recommended:parameter_descriptions
Follow the MCP specification for server metadata. Include server name, version, and protocol version. Provide descriptions for all tools and parameters.
Tools
No tools exposed by this server.
Security Category Deep Dive
Sub-Category Tree · Remediation Roadmap · Attack Stories · Compliance Overlay · ATLAS Techniques · Maturity Model
Prompt Injection
Prompt & context manipulation attacks
69
Maturity
14
Rules
5
Sub-Categories
1
Gaps
64%
Implemented
56
Tests
1
Stories
100%3 rules
Injection via tool descriptions and parameter fields
GAP-001Prompt Injection Coverage GapMissing detection coverage for emerging prompt injection attack variants not addressed by current rules
100%4 rules
Hidden instructions via external content and tool responses
100%2 rules
Context window saturation and prior-approval exploitation
100%3 rules
Payload hiding via invisible chars, base64, schema fields
100%2 rules
Injection via prompt templates and runtime tool output