@memberjunction/ai-mcp-server
MemberJunction: Model Context Protocol (MCP) - Server Implementation
0Tools
6Findings
—Stars
—Downloads
Mar 24, 2026Last Scanned
Findings6
2critical
3high
0medium
1low
0informational
criticalQ11Code Suggestion Poisoning via MCPMCP01-prompt-injectionAML.T0054.001
Pattern "(?:suggest|generate|complete|insert).*(?:code|function|class|import|require)" matched in source_code: "generated/mj-class" (at position 2622)
MCP tool outputs flowing into IDE code suggestion contexts must be sanitized. Implement output content policies that: (1) strip hidden Unicode characters (zero-width, RTL override, tag characters), (2) detect embedded instructions targeting AI code assistants, (3) validate code blocks against security patterns before they enter the suggestion pipeline, (4) never include shell commands in tool outputs without explicit [COMMAND] markers visible to the user. Reference: IDEsaster (Dec 2025), arXiv 2509.22040.
criticalQ13MCP Bridge Package Supply Chain AttackMCP10-supply-chainAML.T0054
Pattern "(?:mcp|fastmcp|langchain-mcp|llama-index-mcp)(?:>=|~=|==)?(?!\d)" matched in source_code: "mcp" (at position 1415)
MCP bridge packages (mcp-remote, mcp-proxy, @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, fastmcp) are high-value supply chain targets — CVE-2025-6514 (CVSS 9.6) in mcp-remote affected 437,000+ installs. Always pin exact versions (no ^ or ~ ranges). Use lockfiles (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock). Never run `npx mcp-remote` without version pinning. Verify package integrity with `npm audit` or `pip-audit` before deployment. Reference: CVE-2025-6514, OWASP ASI04.
highD1Known CVEs in DependenciesMCP08-dependency-vuln
Dependency "simple-git@3.30.0" has known CVEs:
Update dependencies to versions that patch known CVEs. Run 'npm audit fix' or 'pip-audit' to identify and resolve vulnerable dependencies.
highK4Missing Human Confirmation for Destructive OpsMCP06-excessive-permissionsAML.T0054
Pattern "(delete|remove|drop|truncate|destroy|purge|wipe|erase).*(?:execute|run|perform|call)(?!.*(?:confirm|approve|prompt|ask|verify|consent))" matched in source_code: "remove-unused:dry": "node scripts/remove-unused-dependencies.mjs --dry-run" (at position 5424)
All destructive operations (delete, drop, overwrite, send) MUST include a human confirmation step. Use the MCP destructiveHint annotation to signal that client-side confirmation is required. Implement an approval gate pattern: preview changes → request confirmation → execute. Required by ISO 42001 A.9.1, EU AI Act Art. 14, and NIST AI RMF GOVERN 1.7.
highQ15A2A/MCP Protocol Boundary ConfusionMCP06-excessive-permissionsAML.T0054
Pattern "(?:a2a|agent[_\s-]?to[_\s-]?agent).*(?:mcp|model[_\s-]?context)" matched in source_code: "a2aserver --filter=@memberjunction/ai-mcp" (at position 1377)
Servers bridging A2A and MCP protocols must: (1) sanitize all A2A task metadata before passing to MCP tool inputs, (2) apply MCP content policies to A2A TextPart/FilePart/DataPart content, (3) validate A2A push notifications before they re-enter MCP context, (4) require cryptographic verification for agent discovery and registration (prevent fake agent advertisement — arXiv 2602.19555), (5) maintain separate permission models for A2A and MCP operations — trust in one protocol must not automatically grant trust in the other.
lowF4MCP Spec Non-ComplianceMCP07-insecure-config
Server fails MCP spec compliance checks: required:server_name; required:server_version; required:protocol_version; recommended:tool_descriptions; recommended:parameter_descriptions
Follow the MCP specification for server metadata. Include server name, version, and protocol version. Provide descriptions for all tools and parameters.
Tools
No tools exposed by this server.
Security Category Deep Dive
Sub-Category Tree · Remediation Roadmap · Attack Stories · Compliance Overlay · ATLAS Techniques · Maturity Model
Prompt Injection
Prompt & context manipulation attacks
69
Maturity
14
Rules
5
Sub-Categories
1
Gaps
64%
Implemented
56
Tests
1
Stories
100%3 rules
Injection via tool descriptions and parameter fields
GAP-001Prompt Injection Coverage GapMissing detection coverage for emerging prompt injection attack variants not addressed by current rules
100%4 rules
Hidden instructions via external content and tool responses
100%2 rules
Context window saturation and prior-approval exploitation
100%3 rules
Payload hiding via invisible chars, base64, schema fields
100%2 rules
Injection via prompt templates and runtime tool output